samstokes.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the samstokes.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host samstokes.co.uk. Currently, hosted in France and its service provider is Gandi SAS .

ukclimbing.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called GitHub.com containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

the personal blog of sam stokes. rss blog archives startup engineering (part 1) october 10, 2016 | comments what should the engineering team of an early-stage startup care about? the obvious answer: making the startup succeed. making something people want , growing revenue, landing that big customer or the next funding round. but everyone in a startup cares about those things. what should engineering, specifically, care about, in order to make the startup succeed? there’s loads of advice online about how to be effective founders, how to refine your business plan, how to validate your product thesis. but i haven’t found much written about effective engineering for early-stage startups. this is a shame, because for most startups, engineering is pretty important. it’s how you build your product - not to mention probably the majority of your headcount - so the way you go about it will affect the kind of product you build, and even the way your company operates. when you do find advice about startup engineering, it tends to be limited to cursory admonishments to “move fast” and “get shit done”. these slogans aren’t wrong , but they are overly dismissive and reductive. they suggest that the way you do things doesn’t matter at all: anything which doesn’t look like immediate, visible progress must be a waste of time. this all but rules out introspection and improvement. it offers no help with answering questions like: should we do code review? how do we prioritise maintenance work versus developing new features? is it worth it to host our own infrastructure rather than using a cloud platform? i’d like to suggest a more constructive theory of what an early-stage startup engineering team should care about, to help answer those kinds of questions. read on → how to get started making cocktails august 24, 2016 | comments as well as software, i also make cocktails. i got into it a few years ago, and by now it’s become a fully grown hobby, as evidenced by the entire kitchen shelf given over to bottles, and the ongoing invasion of my fridge by mason jars of syrups and infused spirits. (luckily my roommate considers that an acceptable price to pay for having an onsite bartender!) one question i often get asked is: “how do i get started making drinks at home?” home bartending is a very satisfying hobby, not least because you’re working with booze. it offers much of the creativity and sensuality of cooking, but with a fraction of the prep and cleanup work. and there’s a thrill to making a tasty, classy drink at home, for around $4 instead of $8 plus tip. and it doesn’t take much to get started. your average kitchen is probably only missing four cheap pieces of equipment to make a wide variety of cocktails. if you want to get started for yourself, the following are my recommendations for what to get. they also make a nice gift package: buy someone these, wrap them up as a set, and they’ve got four fewer excuses not to start mixing their own drinks. read on → move fast with confidence july 11, 2016 | comments if you work on a software product team, you’ve probably heard, or said, things like this: “the deadline is unreasonable, i can’t do a quality job in that time.” “just ship it already, it doesn’t need to be perfect.” “shipping quickly is the priority, so we don’t have time for testing and code review.” “we’ve been moving too fast recently and breaking too many things. we need to slow down and be more careful.” these sorts of statements often come up when discussing schedule or scope. they frame the decision being made as a choice between two approaches: you can do it fast or do it well , but not both. i believe that “speed vs quality” is a false choice. each time we naïvely frame a decision this way, we do a disservice to ourselves and to our users. sometimes the best way to run fast is to be confident in your footing. read on → let's talk about confidence may 20, 2016 | comments ever been in a conversation like this? engineer: “we’re going to have to cut feature x if we want to launch on time. it’ll take two months to build, but the deadline’s in a month.” product manager: “that’s a shame - our competitors have that feature. i thought you demoed it last week?” engineer: “that was just a prototype. we can’t ship it to users.” product manager: “why not? it looks awesome, and it worked fine in the demo.” engineer: “sure, it basically works, but the code is a mess, and we haven’t done any testing. it’s not ready to ship.” product manager: “it doesn’t have to be perfect. we need to move fast now - we can always fix it later.” engineer: “that’s what you said last time. fine, we’ll ship the prototype… again. don’t blame me when it breaks.” each person is trying to manage the risks they know about, and do what’s best for the business. despite the best of intentions, these conversations can feel frustrating for both parties. it’s easy to feel like the other person doesn’t understand your concerns, or is stubbornly clinging to their own principles. the optimal decision is probably somewhere in the middle, but this kind of discussion rarely gets there. i previously argued that we should stop using the word “quality” because it tends to polarise conversations. now i want to offer an alternative. i propose that most conversations about schedule or scope would go better if they were framed instead around confidence . read on → let's stop talking about quality february 24, 2016 | comments i don’t like discussions about quality in software. don’t get me wrong. i want to build software i can be proud of. i want to be part of teams that build great products. i aspire to craftsmanship. what i dislike is the word “quality”, and how it tends to polarise conversations. quality is subjective a lot of factors go into software quality. good software is fast. good software is maintainable, readable, scalable, and well tested. good software has attractive ui and intuitive interactions. good software has no bugs, or at least no serious bugs, or at least no bugs that our customer support team can’t work around. in practice, quality means whatever you want it to mean. to a fan of unit testing, quality means investing in unit testing. to a designer, quality means beautiful screens and careful interaction design. to a customer support manager, quality means all bugs are documented and the serious ones have an eta. if you tell people that your estimates are higher than expected because you want to do a quality job, some of them will think you’re spending time refactoring and writing tests, and some will think you’re going pixel-by-pixel in photoshop. some of them will end up disappointed. read on → programming is not magic september 22, 2014 | comments when people who program want to convey to others the joy and satisfaction we find in our craft, we often liken it to doing magic. the analogy evokes a sense of empowerment, possibility and freedom. but i think comparing programming to magic actually does unintended harm, because it has another connotation: that programming is a mystical ability, something you are born with, not something you can learn. i want to get a lot more people programming, and i think we need a better analogy to get there. read on → what programming is like may 1, 2014 | comments what is programming like? we in the software profession have done a terrible job of explaining to the public what it is that we do. everyone has interacted with a teacher or a doctor. there are tv shows about lawyers, cops, even government officials. however warped our impression of their day-to-day, we can relate to these professions. tv depicts programmers as modern-day wizards, socially aloof, hacking into systems or bringing the new algorithm online just in time to stop the cyberterrorists — totally disconnected from people’s experience of the software they use every day. software remains mysterious. this isn’t just a problem for awkward “so, what do you do?” conversations at parties. i believe

URL analysis for samstokes.co.uk

https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2016/05/20/confidence/#disqus_thread
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2016/07/11/move-fast-with-confidence/#disqus_thread
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2016/10/10/startup-engineering-part-1/#disqus_thread
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2014/09/22/magic/
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2016/02/24/quality-vs-empathy/
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2016/08/24/home-bar/#disqus_thread
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2016/02/24/quality-vs-empathy/#disqus_thread
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2010/10/20/early-afternoon-serendipity-rainbow-uplighting/#disqus_thread
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2014/09/22/magic/#disqus_thread
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2016/07/11/move-fast-with-confidence/
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2016/10/10/startup-engineering-part-1/
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2010/07/04/vim-wizardry-1/
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/2016/05/20/confidence/
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/images/cocktails/steel-quartet-1280.jpg
https://blog.samstokes.co.uk/blog/archives

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
samstokes.co.uk

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 18-Nov-2014

Registrar:
Gandi [Tag = GANDI]
URL: http://www.gandi.net

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 20-Nov-2003
Expiry date: 20-Nov-2019
Last updated: 20-Nov-2014

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
a.dns.gandi.net
b.dns.gandi.net
c.dns.gandi.net

WHOIS lookup made at 10:16:02 27-Jul-2018

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS samstokes.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

SPONSOR
Gandi [Tag = GANDI]
URL: http://www.gandi.net
Relevant dates:

  CREATED 20-Nov-2003

  CHANGED 20-Nov-2014

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  A.DNS.GANDI.NET 173.246.98.1

  B.DNS.GANDI.NET 213.167.229.1

  C.DNS.GANDI.NET 217.70.179.1

  NAME samstokes.co.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .